Accommodation and food-service research

Accommodation and food-service data sources: hotels, restaurants and franchise operators

US focus. Source documentation checked September 20, 2026. Wisconsin, California, San Francisco and New York City examples are local; integrations were not tested.

Industries covered NAICS 2022 · 72

Accommodation and Food Services. Use these subsectors to narrow the research to the activity you serve.

  • 721Accommodation
  • 722Food Services and Drinking Places

Classification: US Census Bureau, NAICS 2022. Classification describes an establishment’s activity; it does not establish account fit or a buying need.

In this guide 6 sections

The most useful hospitality research connects the brand a customer recognizes, the business operating the service, the physical location and the people responsible for a purchase. Start with restaurant, hotel and operator websites. Add franchise disclosures, licenses, inspections and property evidence to verify the relationships.

This applies beyond restaurant chains. A branded hotel may have a separate property owner and management company. A cafeteria inside a university may be run by a contracted food-service operator. Finding the correct operating organization changes both the qualification process and the likely buying team.

Hospitality research questions and starting points
QuestionWhere to start
Which sites fit our service?Brand directories, operator portfolios and establishment records.
Who operates them?Franchise disclosures, management portfolios and business records.
Which approvals may affect a purchase?Franchise supplier requirements and documented contract scope.
Is a relevant project underway?Permits, dated announcements and procurement notices.
Who evaluates and approves the offer?Operations, engineering, procurement and professional role evidence.

Keep the brand, operator, location and person separate

A restaurant group can operate several brands through multiple legal entities. A franchisor may operate some locations directly while franchisees run others. Hotels add property owners, management companies and sometimes a separate food-and-beverage operator. Do not merge these records because they share a logo, street address or reservation platform.

Keep a location identifier and address alongside every relationship, with a source and observation date. A portfolio-wide claim does not establish that a particular site is still operated by the group. An acquisition announcement needs a completion check before it changes your account hierarchy.

Accommodation includes hotels, other traveler lodging and formats such as RV parks and recreational camps. Research the amenities, physical infrastructure and seasonal operating model relevant to your offer. Food services range from full-service and limited-service restaurants to caterers, mobile vendors, drinking places and institutional operators. A health permit or brand directory covers only part of that range.

Sources for restaurant and franchise operators

Operator portfolios and first-party location pages

Flynn Group's portfolio illustrates why the operator deserves its own account record alongside the restaurant brands. First-party pages can describe brand relationships, markets and business structure. Pair them with individual location pages for service territory and format. A corporate footprint claim is not a verified current roster of every operating entity.

Franchise disclosure documents

Wisconsin DFI's franchise search provides a route to filed registration material and disclosures. In an FDD, Item 20 covers outlet history and franchisee information, while Item 8 describes purchasing and supplier restrictions. These can answer both “which operator?” and “does this purchase require brand approval?”

The franchise disclosure requirements permit a geographic alternative to a nationwide franchisee list. Read the document's year, scope and amendments. Outlet statistics and listed franchisees are a dated disclosure, not a live ownership database or evidence that a franchisee can independently select every vendor.

Business identity and alcohol licenses

California business-entity records can corroborate a legal name, entity number, status and filed information. They do not supply a complete ownership tree. A registered agent's administrative role does not make that person a buyer.

California ABC reports offer license-type and geographic searches plus downloadable records. Match licensee, premises, type and status to the operating-site hypothesis. A premises may have more than one relevant license, while a pending application is not proof that a restaurant or hotel has opened.

Health inspections and permits

New York City's restaurant inspection dataset supplies establishment identifiers, trading names, addresses and inspection information. Its grain is important: multiple violation rows can belong to one inspection and restaurant. Use the CAMIS identifier to connect records, then examine dates and context. A recorded finding does not establish a current equipment failure or a need for your service.

San Francisco's building permits can identify a work description, address, status and project dates. Kitchen or dining-room alterations may justify investigation, but the applicant could be a contractor or landlord. Keep permit identity separate from address rows, and distinguish filed, issued and completed work. A permit valuation is not an uncommitted equipment budget.

Research hotels and other accommodation

Marriott's hotel directory is a first-party route to branded properties and location pages. Use property descriptions and amenities to qualify the service format: a hotel restaurant, meeting facility and limited-service lodging operation may require different offers. A booking page establishes the marketed property, not necessarily its legal owner or employer.

Marriott's 2025 annual filing distinguishes owned, leased, managed, franchised and other arrangements. This explains why a hotel carrying a major brand may still require research into a separate owner or operator. Reported system rooms and hotel-owner relationships are not the brand company's property ownership or an individual hotel's revenue.

For named lodging discovery, the US Fire Administration's Hotel-Motel National Master List supports searches by property name and geography and provides a CSV download. It lists accommodation approved for federal travelers under the program's fire-safety criteria. It is a defined participation list, not every US hotel, every campground or evidence of a current safety-equipment purchase.

Local licenses can add operating identity. New York City's hotel licensing information describes its hotel-operator licensing program, and DCWP's business search allows license checking without an account. Retain the business and license identity; do not assume the licensee owns the real estate. New York's rules and records do not imply nationwide coverage.

Next, compare the property's name and address with the management company's portfolio and dated announcements. If ownership matters for a capital project, corroborate it through the applicable local property-record system. A hotel name can change while the building remains, so address and property identifiers should outlast the marketing name.

For RV parks, camps and other lodging formats, first verify the operator and actual amenities through its own reservation or property pages. Then investigate locally applicable permits. Do not use absence from a hotel-specific list as an exclusion unless the offer truly requires hotel-program participation.

Research food-service contracts and people

Institutional food service needs a client-to-operator relationship. Compass Group's company overview separates operating companies and markets such as business and education. It helps locate the relevant division, but does not establish that a particular campus or workplace is a current client. Use a dated client announcement, contract or the institution's own dining page to verify that link.

Public procurement can be a less obvious source. SAM.gov contract opportunities includes federal solicitations, presolicitations and award notices, searchable without an account. A food-service notice can describe service scope and procurement stage. The contracting office's contact is not the private operator's buyer, and an open solicitation does not establish which operator will win.

For roles, distinguish the operational user, technical evaluator, purchasing team and approver. Restaurant refrigeration may involve facilities and operations; a hotel retrofit may also involve engineering, management and ownership; institutional menus and supplies may be constrained by a client contract. Treat each as a hypothesis requiring confirmation.

Flynn's leadership pages show executive, brand and support responsibilities. Combine current biographies with public job descriptions to understand remit, location and reporting context. A vacancy might be replacement hiring, and naming a system in a job advertisement does not prove a replacement project. Save professional role evidence without inventing purchasing authority or a mutual connection.

Turn the evidence into a useful account brief

Consider a hypothetical refrigeration-service supplier targeting restaurant groups and hotels with substantial food-service operations across the Bay Area. It chooses operators with several serviceable sites, excludes lodging without relevant kitchen operations and excludes properties outside its response radius.

  1. Find candidates through brand and operator pages. Verify addresses and the particular food-service format rather than inferring kitchen requirements from a hospitality label.
  2. Connect sites to operators using portfolios, FDDs and applicable business or license records. Keep hotel owner, manager and brand separate; flag uncertain matches.
  3. Investigate relevant permits and dated project announcements. A kitchen alteration raises a scope question; it does not prove refrigeration is being replaced or the supplier is undecided.
  4. Identify facilities, engineering or procurement responsibilities. For franchises, check supplier restrictions; for hotels and institutional dining, determine whether ownership or a client contract affects selection.
  5. Present documented facts, commercial hypotheses and open questions separately. “The operator lists these local sites” is a fact. “A shared service arrangement may fit” is a hypothesis. “Who controls the existing contract?” remains a question.

Attach the sources, observation dates and appropriate published business contact route. Rank operational fit separately from timing. The account-brief worksheet helps preserve that distinction during handoff.

Questions suppliers often ask

Is there one complete hospitality-owner database?

No public source universally joins brand, property owner, operator, location and buyer. Different registers have different coverage. Keep missing relationships unknown.

Does an FDD identify every franchisee?

Not necessarily. Check the permitted geographic alternative, reporting period and appendices, then verify current operator relationships.

Is the hotel general manager always the buyer?

No. A general manager may explain operations while procurement, management-company engineering, ownership or brand standards control the purchase.

Which source should I buy first?

Test a small sample first. Pay for a demonstrated gap such as management-company relationships or location verification; more property names alone will not resolve who buys.

Put the research to work

Start with your next commercial decision.

Explore how to define the accounts, questions and evidence that matter to your growth.

Explore GTM intelligence strategy